Netta Tech
EN ES CA
← All products

Netta Review

Study reviews against OECD, ISO & SANCO/SANTE — automated, cited, reviewer-ready.

Netta Review is automated study review for contract research organisations and GLP laboratories. It reviews study plans and reports against OECD and ISO guidelines, and analytical methods against SANCO/SANTE. Every parameter is graded CRITICAL, MINOR or COMPLIANT, with the exact guideline paragraph cited. Around four hours saved on a typical review.

Book a demo See how it works →

~85%

less time per review

0

findings without a cited source

< 15 min

typical review turnaround

Regulatory scope

  • OECD test guidelines

    Study plans & reports

  • ISO standards

    Study plans & reports

  • SANCO / SANTE

    Analytical method review

  • GLP compliance

    Good Laboratory Practice framing

  • Study plans & reports

    Against OECD & ISO

  • Analytical methods

    Against SANCO/SANTE

How it works

From a folder of study documents to a graded Word review.

  1. 01

    Upload the study

    Drop in the study plan, analytical method or final report as PDF or Word. Add the COA, TIDS and any supporting context files so the review sees the full picture.

  2. 02

    Pick the review mode

    Three purpose-built modes: study plan review, analytical method review, or study report review. Each runs a different checklist — OECD and ISO for study plans and reports, SANCO/SANTE for analytical methods.

  3. 03

    Findings graded

    Every parameter returns a finding — CRITICAL, MINOR or COMPLIANT — with the exact guideline paragraph cited as the justification. No opinion without a reference.

  4. 04

    Export the Word document

    Download a reviewer-ready .docx with all findings laid out for the study director, the QA lead and the sponsor. Track-changes friendly, ready for the file.

The reviewer stays in the loop on every finding. Netta Review drafts, the scientist signs off. No finding without a cited guideline paragraph. More consistent than manual review — the system checks every item, every time. No reviewer fatigue, no missed paragraphs.

What gets reviewed

Three review modes for the three documents that matter.

Study plan review

  • Objective and study design coherence
  • Test item identity and stability
  • Test system selection and dosing
  • Observation schedule vs guideline
  • QA and archiving provisions
  • Deviations and justifications

Analytical method review

  • Method scope vs guideline requirements
  • Validation parameters (linearity, LOQ, LOD)
  • Specificity and selectivity
  • Precision and accuracy
  • Stability of analyte
  • System suitability

Final report review

  • Reported results vs protocol
  • Data integrity and traceability
  • Statistical treatment
  • Discussion vs findings
  • Deviations documented and addressed
  • QA statement completeness

Full-picture review

  • Upload supporting documents alongside the study
  • Inconsistencies flagged automatically
  • Every finding cited to its source
  • PDF and Word inputs accepted
  • Mixed-language documents supported
  • Nothing missed because it was in a different file

Deployment

EU-hosted by default. On-premise on request.

Cloud

EU-hosted SaaS

  • Hosted in the European Union
  • LLM inference in EU regions under enterprise DPA
  • Contractual prohibition on training on client data
  • Onboarding within the week

On-premise

Available on request

  • Air-gapped deployment for the most sensitive labs
  • Quoted per engagement — discuss during the demo
  • Custom integration with your document management system
  • Compatible with hardened environments

Why Netta Review

We didn’t build another study-management platform.

Most tools in this space are end-to-end study-management suites with a review tab buried three menus deep. Netta Review is the review tab — sharp, fast, built for the phase where findings actually matter.

  • Generic end-to-end study management platforms with review bolted on
    Purpose-built for the review phase — nothing to unlearn
  • Pathology-only AI review tools
    Covers the full study document — design, methods, reports
  • Manual checklist consulting priced by the hour
    Runs in minutes, structured output, reproducible across reviewers
  • Tools that cover one guideline family only
    OECD, ISO and SANCO/SANTE in one tool — study plans, reports and analytical methods
  • Opaque AI that confidently invents findings
    Every finding cites the specific guideline paragraph it relies on

Questions

The ones a QA lead asks first.

If yours isn’t here, a 30-minute demo is the fastest way to get it answered. We don’t do gated whitepapers.

Book a demo
Which guidelines does Netta Review cover? +

OECD test guidelines and ISO standards for study plans and reports, and SANCO/SANTE guidance for analytical methods. New guidelines are added as ECHA, OECD, ISO and DG SANTE publish them.

Which review types are supported? +

Three: pre-study plan review, analytical method review, and final study report review. Each runs a different checklist built for the phase.

What document formats does it accept? +

PDF and Word documents. You can attach the study plan together with the certificate of analysis, test item data sheet and any supporting context files in one upload.

How do you prevent errors or invented findings? +

Every finding is grounded in a cited paragraph from the applicable guideline — OECD, ISO or SANCO/SANTE. The reviewer sees the citation next to the finding before accepting it. No finding ships without a defensible source.

Where does the data live? +

On the SaaS tier, application and LLM inference run in the European Union under contractual terms prohibiting use of your data for model training. On-premise deployment is available on request.

Can guidelines be customised for in-house SOPs? +

The shipped guideline catalogue is curated by Netta and updated centrally. Custom SOP checklists can be added for on-premise engagements — talk to us during the demo.

What does the output look like? +

A Word document with one row per parameter — graded CRITICAL, MINOR or COMPLIANT — followed by the cited paragraph and the reviewer-ready justification. Ready to drop straight into the file.

How long is onboarding? +

Production within the week on the SaaS tier. On-premise timelines depend on your infrastructure and typically run two to four weeks.

Other products

Poseu-vos en contacte

Llest per veure-ho funcionar amb els vostres documents?

Reserveu una trucada de 30 minuts. Sense presentacions — processem els vostres documents reals a través del sistema i vosaltres veieu el resultat. Si no us estalvia temps, us ho direm.

Reserveu una trucada de 30 minuts hola@netta-tech.com